Selecting Units for Hand Hygiene Monitoring

Grounded in Real-World Measurement (Leapfrog, CMS, Joint Commission)

When deciding which units should be monitored, the most effective approach is to align monitoring with where hand hygiene is externally measured, publicly reported, and clinically consequential.

1. Start With Externally Measured Risk Areas 

Leapfrog and other oversight bodies place the highest scrutiny on units where:

• Patients are most vulnerable 
• HAIs have the greatest impact on outcomes and reputation 
• Hand hygiene is a core prevention expectation

Priority Units: 

• ICU / CCU / SICU / MICU 
• NICU 
• Step-Down / Progressive Care
• Transplant Units 
• Oncology / Hematology 
• Burn Units (if applicable)

These units directly influence: 

• Leapfrog Safety Grade 
• HAI metrics (CLABSI, CAUTI, MRSA, SSI, C. diff) 
• CMS and state reporting

2. Include Units That Drive Hospital-Wide Culture

Leapfrog doesn’t just assess outcomes — it evaluates systemic safety behaviors.

High-impact cultural units: 

• Med-Surg 
• Telemetry
•  ED (clinical staff only, when feasible)

Why these matter:

• Largest staff populations 
• Highest number of hand hygiene opportunities 

• Behavior here influences downstream units

   

Pro Tip: Improvements in these areas often produce facility-wide lift, not just unit-specific gains.

3. Exclude or De-Prioritize Areas That Do Not Produce Defensible Data

A key part of Leapfrog alignment is ensuring the data is fair, consistent, and defensible.

Typically not recommended for primary monitoring:

• OR / procedural suites (glove-based workflows)
• Radiology / imaging 
• Environmental Services (unless part of a specific initiative)

These areas often create false negatives, inconsistent opportunity capture, or workflows not aligned with Leapfrog expectations.

4. Tie Unit Selection to What Leapfrog Actually Cares About

Leapfrog is not asking: “Are you monitoring everyone everywhere?”

They are asking: "Are you monitoring the right areas, in a way that improves safety and outcomes?”

Strong Leapfrog-aligned story sounds like: 

1. "We prioritized high-risk inpatient units tied to HAI reduction.” 
2. "We focused on units with the highest opportunity density and patient acuity.” 
3. "We intentionally excluded workflows that would produce unreliable data.”

5. Select and Commit to Units Upfront

Organizations define the units they want monitored at the start based on risk, oversight expectations, and readiness.

This allows teams to: 

• Align monitoring with Leapfrog and regulatory priorities 
• Set clear expectations across selected units 
• Configure workflows and hardware correctly from day one

The goal is intentional selection, not gradual expansion.

Contact Support